Saturday, February 27, 2010

Dominican Despot


On March 12, 1956, Jesus de Galindez, lecturer in Spanish and Government at Columbia University, took leave of a student who had given him a lift from the campus and entered the subway station at 57th Street and Eighth Avenue. "He was never seen or heard from again, except by the persons who presumably kidnapped and killed him." (Crassweller, p. 312)

De Galindez was an exile from two countries -- Spain, which he had fled in 1940 after the defeat of the Loyalists, and the Dominican Republic, where he had worked as a legal adviser in the Labor Department and his pro-labor stance had incurred the wrath of its dictator, Rafael Trujillo.


Scholarly and politically active, de Galindez became obsessed with Trujillo. Compiling all known facts about the man, he produced a 750-page damning critique, which he submitted for his Ph.D. (Entitled The Era of Trujillo, it was published in 1973, two copies, one in English, one in Spanish, having survived his disappearance.) A colleague at Columbia referred to de Galindez as a "one-man intelligence bureau" who "knew more about Trujillo than anyone else in the world." (Ornes, p. 310)


Detectives assigned to the case uncovered some ominous coincidences. Two Dominican ships had been in the New York harbor the night of the 12th; one put out to sea and returned five hours later, while the other was searched after a rumor surfaced that de Galindez had been thrown into the boiler. It was reported that the victim had received several visits from a shadowy Dominican hit man, El Cojo, before the latter himself vanished March 1st en route from Miami to the Dominican Republic.

The mystery prompted President Eisenhower to comment on it at two news conferences.

But after an intensive six-month manhunt turned up nothing substantive, the affair faded into the murkiness of the Caribbean underworld -- until, on December 3rd, an American citizen, Gerald Murphy, a pilot for the Dominican airline CDA, went missing in the Dominican capital. As Murphy's Oregonian congressmen, Representative Charles Porter and Senator Wayne Morse, at the behest of Murphy's parents, pressed Dominican authorities for an explanation, they received a letter from a Dominican exile group in Puerto Rico which claimed that Murphy was murdered because he knew too much about the de Galindez case.

Within days, the Trujillo web of deceit and destruction ensnared another victim. The Dominican Government produced a perpetrator, Octavio de la Maza, and a script; arrested and jailed, de la Maza was to admit that he had thrown Murphy off the seaside cliff where his car had been found, defending himself from Murphy's homosexual advances. When de la Maza refused to play his part and confess, he was found hanging by his neck from the shower head of his cell, a remorseful suicide note by his side acknowledging his guilt.


Most of the unsavory details of this "extraordinarily bizarre crime" emerged over the next few months during the trial of John J. Frank in Federal District Court. Frank, a former FBI agent, pleaded no contest to the charge that he had served as an agent for Trujillo's government without registering as such. (Crassweller, p. 316)

De Galindez had been under Dominican surveillance in New York for some time because of his opposition to the regime and his writings. Dominican agents had tried to buy his manuscript for $25,000 but had been rebuffed. They lured the twenty-two-year-old Murphy -- whose lifelong ambition to fly for the military or commercially had been thwarted by poor vision -- to the Dominican Republic with the promise of a lucrative charter contract.

With money supplied by Frank, Murphy rented a twin-engine Beech aircraft, illegally outfitted it with extra fuel tanks to increase its range, and flew it to Amityville, New York, on the night of March 12th. An ambulance arrived; a heavily-sedated man on a stretcher was removed, placed in a wheelchair, and carried aboard the plane.

Murphy flew to West Palm Beach, where he refueled, and from there to Monti Cristi in the Dominican Republic, and perhaps to a Trujillo estate, where the dictator himself may have struck the first blow before turning de Galindez over to others to kill. No one really knows. The body was never found; death came swiftly and secretively to those privy to the truth. (Crassweller, p. 318)

When Murphy began to talk too much, particularly to his girl friend, and to plan a return to the United States, he also was doomed.


This grotesque three-act tragedy holds a weird fascination for me, not just for its lurid elements -- a midnight kidnapping, a contrived suicide, disappearing bodies, lost witnesses -- but because it typifies the worst excesses of the man who for thirty years -- from 1930 to 1960 -- ruled the Dominican Republic as if it it were his personal fiefdom. While others of his ilk have reached beyond their borders to eliminate their own or foreign nationals, to murder three individuals merely to suppress an expose of his regime reeks of unbridled ruthlessness, frightening megalomania, towering egotism, coldblooded connivance, and the "omnipotent imposition of will."

I became intrigued by Rafael Trujillo a few years ago when I read the novel The Feast of the Goat by Mario Vargas Llosa, both a gripping account of the his assassination on May 30, 1961, and a masterful portrayal of the dictator and the repressive nature of his regime.

That fateful day is the epicenter of three interrelated narratives that drift back and forth in time. A quartet of conspirators waits through the tense evening hours for Trujillo's Chevy to appear, each one reflecting on how, after years of serving the man, he came to this spot. In the present-day Dominican Republic, middle-aged Urania Cabal, a fictional character, talking to her mute, infirm father and her cousins, reveals the shocking circumstances of her self-imposed exile thirty years ago and confronts her emotional wounds. Meanwhile, Trujillo himself moves through a series of meetings with various officials towards an anticipated assignation planned for that evening, aging but still powerful, ill-tempered, abusive, perpetually suspicious, cynically manipulative, charismatic, and "even at the age of sixty-nine, inclined to that preoccupation with sex that earned him the nickname, the Goat." (David Klopfenstein, Fall of the Patriarch, The Modern World, March 26, 2003)

My interest was further piqued when not long afterward I met a Dominican native, a vivacious black-haired beauty with a beaming smile, Patricia R., who three weeks ago became engaged to my younger son, Matthew. Patricia's father, Julio Manuel R., whom I have yet to meet, is a practicing physician but also an historian; having survived the rigors of the Trujillo regime, he apparently has become as obsessed as Dr. de Galindez was, authoring three books and a blog on the subject.

Trujillo was heir to a long tradition of one-man rule or caudillism -- the furtherance of one's personal ambitions through the instrument of politics. Caudillism had strong roots in a Spanish colonial culture which, characterized by the dispersion of the populace over a wide area and a hierarchical social structure, exalted personal and family values, absolutism, and extremism over community, compromise, and self-control. (Crassweller, p. 17)

For fifteen years the heart of the Spanish Empire in the West Indies, the island of Hispaniola declined precipitously in prestige and population after 1515, when that hub shifted to Cuba. French influence, spilling across from neighboring Tortuga, overran the western side, until in 1697 the Treaty of Ryswick confirmed French rule and severed the present-day Haiti from Spanish Santo Domingo.

Although always isolated, insulated, and family-centered, Spanish colonial society enjoyed a revival of sorts until the Haitians threw off their French masters in 1798. Emboldened by independence, Haitian forces invaded Santo Domingo, unleashed a rampage of rape, looting, torture, and murder, and stayed for twenty-two years. "Spanish culture was stifled, and every phase of life was Haitianized. Emigration emptied the land. Agriculture almost ceased. Civil law was suspended . . . The public spirit suffocated." (Crassweller, p. 19)

In 1844 revolutionary conspirators under the dynamic leadership of Juan Pablo Duarte seized several key strongholds and fortresses, forced the local Haitian commander to capitulate, proclaimed the independence of the Dominican Republic -- and launched an era of caudillist "cupidity and misgovernment." In what was to become a familiar pattern, Duarte and his collaborators -- acclaimed by future generations as the fathers of the nation -- were jailed and exiled. (Crassweller, p. 19)


For the next thirty years, the country was dominated by two alternating strongmen -- Pedro Santana, whose source of power was the Army, and Buenaventura Baez, who drew his support from Congress. "Each repeatedly exercised sole authority"; greedy and deceitful, "neither one . . . ever performed a constructive act that could be regarded as unselfish." (Crassweller, p. 19)


In 1882 this long national nightmare of "oppressive, corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous government" was trumped by the ascension of Ulises Heureaux, who established a reign of pure tyranny that seemed impossible to surpass -- until the advent of Trujillo. To make matters worse, he borrowed profligately from foreign sources under exceedingly onerous terms, using the funds for his personal use and to maintain his police state. Just before his demise, he resorted to the desperate measure of selling disputed border territory to the despised Haitians. By the time he was assassinated in 1899, the government was weak, unstable, and bankrupt, and France, Germany, and the United States were threatening to intervene to protect their nationals and their bonds. (Crassweller, p. 21)


After President Theodore Roosevelt proclaimed the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine in 1905 -- which enabled the United States to take over the administration of Dominican customs revenues and use the proceeds to retire the country's debt -- a brief period of tranquility ensued, coincident with the benign rule of General Ramon Caceres. But when Caceres met the same fate as Heureaux in 1911, civil war erupted and anarchy returned, prompting President Woodrow Wilson to order the occupation of the Dominican Republic by the United States Marines in 1916.

While the military administration pacified the countryside, revived the economy, conducted a land survey, promoted public education, and built a road network that connected the far-flung regions, native dissatisfaction and repudiation led to sporadic outbreaks of guerilla warfare and subsequent brutal repression by the Americans. President Warren Harding ended the occupation in 1922. Elected in 1924, for the next six years President Horatio Vasquez governed with a rare honesty, a progressive and cooperative spirit, the nurturing of public order, and a respect for civil rights.


Rafael Trujillo was in one respect an offspring of the Americans, a product of the Dominican National Guard, which was established by the Occupation in 1917. He was admitted to the Guard and commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in 1919.

The life of the Army perfectly suited the young son of a small-time commodities dealer from San Cristobal. It was the traditional path to power, glory, and even wealth in Spanish America; it embodied his penchant for order and discipline, action and achievement; its uniforms, parades, music, and pomp foreshadowed his fixation on drama, display, and self-promotion. (Crassweller, p.44)


Trujillo rose rapidly through the ranks until, concurrent with the transformation of the National Police (formerly the National Guard) into a Brigade in August 1927, he was promoted to Brigadier General. Nine months later he was named Chief of the newly-created National Army. Along the way, he initiated the machinations that would become his trademarks, enriching himself through his control of military procurement and planting cronies in key positions. He enjoyed the unquestioning confidence of President Vasquez, who refused to credit reports of irregularities in the Army's budget and of Trujillo's plotting to overthrow his government.

Vasquez was betrayed on February 22,1930, when Trujillo allowed a small rebel force -- which he had surreptitiously supplied with old army rifles -- under the leadership of Rafael Estrella Urena, a charismatic, ambitious politician from Santiago, to enter the capital, Santo Domingo, while keeping his own troops -- far superior in numbers and armament -- sequestered in the Ozama Fortress. Besieged and outmaneuvered, Vasquez appointed Estrella Urena to the office of Secretary of the Interior and the Police, from which he succeeded to the Presidency on March 3rd, when Vasquez and his Vice-President resigned.


But it was Trujillo who held the substance of power; under the ruse of preserving order in the city and preventing bloodshed, he ordered the Army to take possession of all weapons held by rebel forces.

An election was scheduled for May 16; the next two months were a dress rehearsal for the ruthless tactics Trujillo would employ to subjugate his countrymen for a generation. By coercion and bribery, he secured the Presidential nomination of the Confederation Party. Using the Army as his personal instrument, he embarked on a systematic campaign of terror and intimidation directed at his opponents, the Alliance Party, which enjoyed greater popular support.

A body of storm troopers -- known as La 42 -- dealt out random beatings, disrupted meetings of the opposition, and kidnapped and murdered presumed enemies. Leaders of the Alliance were fired upon on the outskirts of Santiago; their pants and hats were riddled with bullet holes. Confronted by Trujillo thugs, members of the Central Electoral Board resigned on May 7th and were quickly replaced by Trujillo designates. On May 15th, the Alliance Party withdrew its candidates on the grounds that the election would be nothing but a farce.

Trujillo and his Vice-Presidential running mate, Estrella Urena, received 224,000 votes, which exceeded the number of registered voters in the country. The best estimates concluded that perhaps 25 per cent of the eligible public showed up to ratify what had already been decreed. The two officials were sworn in on August 16, 1930. The Era of Trujillo had begun.


A fierce hurricane blew through the city of Santo Domingo on September 3rd, killing 2500, injuring 8000 (out of a population of 80,000), and leveling 10,000 buildings. The disaster presented Trujillo not only the opportunity to demonstrate his limitless reserves of energy and his superb administrative skills; it provided a pretext for the National Congress to suspend constitutional guarantees, to invest the new President with extraordinary powers, and, four years later, to change the name of the capital to Ciudad Trujillo. In the chaos of the crisis, more opponents were executed by roving goon squads, their bodies doused with gasoline and cremated alongside hurricane victims.


Having attained the pinnacle of his ambitions, Trujillo was determined to stay there. His formula was simple: extreme centralization of executive authority and brutal suppression of all disagreement. "Discontent with the regime, indifference toward the regime, opposition toward the regime, all found a common denominator in persecution by Trujillo." (Ornes, p. 66)

During his first year in office, at least one thousand Dominicans on his blacklist were killed. Thousands of others were imprisoned and tortured. An entire generation of domestic leaders was eliminated. Fearing for his life, former collaborator -- and dupe -- Estrella Urena fled to New York, where he lived in exile for eight years. (Ornes, p. 67)

The legislative branch of the government was commandeered through the formation of a political party, the Party of General Trujillo, officially constituted on August 16, 1931. All decisions and nominations were strictly controlled by its namesake. No Dominican in public life, business, the professions, or the arts could survive outside its ranks. With no competitive political purpose, yet accumulating vast reserves through a ten per cent fee deducted from the paychecks of all its members, it transitioned into a social service organization -- dispensing medicine and meals for the poor, making welfare payments, financing church construction, and funding highway and agricultural projects. (Crassweller, p. 100)

After the submission came the conversion. Trujillo craved the approbation of all Dominicans. Through fear, the carrot of personal advancement, or vulgar bribery, people soon learned that they had to be vocally on the Chief's side, since apathy was as sinful as subversion. The lure of public office converted many doubters, though often at the cost of repeated humiliations -- long waits in the outer office, press attacks, social snubs, and obligatory eulogies -- since Trujillo believed that "men served best when they were trampled upon and degraded." (Ornes, p. 102)

Along with the conversion of the high-born and the aspiring came the institutionalization of two other doctrines: one which demanded endless praise for the dictator, an adulation increasing over the years to deification; and one which proclaimed the nullity of all others and their dignification only at the pleasure of Trujillo. (Crassweller, p. 117)

During Trujillo's second term -- he was reelected President in 1934 -- his strong man rule evolved into a truly authoritarian government. The Party became a state within a state, as local leaders were required to report to headquarters on all developments within their districts. In 1937 a law was passed that permitted the President to assume the duties of any Secretaryships of State that might be vacant.

That same year Trujillo augmented his reputation as a merciless butcher when he committed his most heinous crime: the genocide of 18,000 Haitians -- his solution to the centuries-old problem of Haitian encroachment into Dominican territory. Driven by overpopulation and the depletion of natural resources, Haitians had long been penetrating the border and settling on abandoned land -- and, in the process, ravaging Dominican agriculture and cattle-raising, usurping the currency, corrupting the language, grafting voodooism and cultism onto the established Catholic faith, and importing their public health problem. (Crassweller, pp. 150-151)

At the same time he was in discussions with Haitian President Stenio Vincent on a border treaty -- which was signed in the spring of 1936 -- Trujillo was engaged in a devious plot to undermine his government. When he learned that important underground agents in Haiti had been discovered and killed, on October 2, 1937, he gave the order to launch the carefully-coordinated Army attacks that would result in the death of thousands.


The killing spree would become known as the the "Parsley Massacre," a name derived from the shibboleth soldiers employed to determine whether border inhabitants were native Dominicans or immigrant Haitians. Asked to identify a sprig of parsley, or perejil, those whose French Creole accent rendered them incapable of pronouncing the Spanish trilled "r" marked themselves as Haitians destined for extermination.

As twenty thousand innocents were cut down by gunfire, drowned in seawater, or decapitated, Trujillo was reported to have made a hacking motion with his hand and to have remarked, "While I was negotiating, they were going sha-sha-sha," imitating the chopping sound of a machete cutting through flesh. (Crassweller, p. 155) Afterward, attempting to justify the purge, he issued a Mein Kampf apologia entitled Estudios Del Terror Y Los Terrors De La Historia, in which he propounded his own ideological brand of hatred.

The slaughter of the Haitians generated an international scandal and elicited a unanimous rebuke from all of Latin America and the United States. Threatened with the revocation of American recognition by Congressman Hamilton Fish, Trujillo eventually agreed to an indemnity payment of $750,000 -- later reduced to $525,000 through the bribing of Haitian government officials, many of whom appropriated most of the settlement money to themselves, leaving a pittance for the victims' survivors.

Stung by worldwide condemnation of the massacres, Trujillo chose to renounce the Presidency in 1938 and install his first surrogate, Jacinto Peynado; lacking resolution and leadership ability, preferring leisure and indolence to the perquisites of power, he was perfectly suited to the role. He accepted with equanimity the embarrassing, diabolical reduction of his personal staff from a corps of adjutants to a single guard and his office from a suite to one room, even as he was elevated in title.


Trujillo used the respite to showcase the stability of his regime even in his absence, to attempt to repair his shattered image, and to debut on the world stage. On June 30, 1939, he sailed on a four-month voyage that took him to Miami, to Washington D.C. for an audience with President Roosevelt, to the World's Fair in New York City, to the Mediterranean for a brief pre-war cruise, and back to the United Sates before returning home through Miami, where he met and rehabilitated his former colleague Estrella Urena, allowing him to return to his homeland two months later, "saddened and broken after eight years of exile and poverty." (Crassweller, p. 176)

Peynado, afflicted with the last stages of diabetes, died on March 7, 1940; he was succeeded the next day by Trujillo's second puppet, Manuel Troncoso de la Concha. Ten years prior Troncoso had been jailed on suspicion of conspiring with the Alliance; now he swore an oath of loyalty to the Constitution -- and to Rafael Trujillo, Supreme Chief and Director of the Dominican Republic.


The highlight of Troncoso's administration -- and the culmination of Trujillo's career up to that point -- was the latter's self-appointment as Ambassador Extraordinary on Special Mission to Washington, where on September 24, 1940, he and Secretary of State Cordell Hull, after four years of strenuous negotiations, signed a treaty terminating the United States' administration of Dominican customs and finances. Although funds collected by the Dominican government would still be deposited in a New York City bank and distributed to Dominican bondholders by a bank officer, Trujillo's propaganda machine used the occasion to launch an extensive media blitz lauding him as the country's financial savior.

Of particular interest to me is a dramatic offer Trujillo's delegate to the Evian Conference made in July 1938: to admit to the country up to 100,000 Jewish refugees from Europe. Although his motives were suspect -- critics said he wanted to "whiten" the population -- Trujillo himself contributed a 26,000-acre tract of land. In May 1940, eight hundred immigrants established an agricultural colony at Sosua, a remote area on the northern coast. Disheartened by the harsh pioneering environment, far removed from the urban commercialism that had ordered their lives, most eventually relocated to the United States, leaving behind a quaint memorial to the anomalies of history. (Crassweller, p. 200)

In February 1942, Trujillo discarded Troncoso. Perched astride a prancing, pure-blooded Arabian stallion, he welcomed a delegation of Dominican and Trujillo Party leaders bearing the mandatory tributes and the Presidential nomination. Trying to control his energetic mount, Trujillo responded with a rallying cry that swept the nation: "And I will go ahead on horseback." (Crassweller, p. 195)


World War II marked a watershed in the Era of Trujillo and in the development of the Dominican economy. With commodities in short supply, world prices for Dominican agricultural products -- sugar, coffee, cocoa, tobacco -- soared, as did the national budget. On July 21, 1947, Trujillo presented a check to a representative of the country's bondholders in full payment of its foreign debt. The same year a Central Bank was founded; one of its first actions was to issue a national currency, the peso.

During the immediate post-war period, the regime tolerated a modicum of liberal activity -- or rather the contrived appearance of such activity -- and allowed a Labor Confederation to emerge from hibernation. A two-week sugar strike broke out in January 1946; it was settled with concessions to the workers and without violence or reprisals (although several leaders were later assassinated), after which the labor movement quietly expired.

In March 1946, by permitting fictitious puppet parties to operate as presumed oppositionists, Trujillo lured the Communist -- or Popular Socialist -- Party into the open just long enough to smother it. When it organized a large public meeting in Ciudad Trujillo, government agents created incidents sufficient to warrant police intervention and strong repressive measures. Communists were jailed, killed, and exiled; the Party was outlawed in June 1947.

By now Trujillo had perfected his formula for managing his inner circle. By playing one henchman against another, by alternating reward and punishment, by elevating and crushing his underlings with startling rapidity and regularity, he allowed no one to challenge his supremacy. The careers of Paino Pichardo and Alvarez Paulino are instructive.

From 1939 to 1945 Pichardo was Trujillo's right hand man. In January 1945, he fell from grace, losing his positions, his honorary posts, even his car. The next year he was recalled to Secretary of the Presidency, only to relinquish that office in January 1947 for a far lesser one, Inspector of Embassies and Legations. Two years later he held briefly a higher administrative position, before succumbing to a banishment that would last for six years.

Paulino replaced him in January 1949, and by 1951 had garnered so much power that his voice was said to be synonymous with Trujillo's. A medium-dark mulatto, weighing 250 pounds, dubbed the Magic Eye for his glass organ, naturally arrogant, he looked and played his role well, which was that of a mercenary thug. While he delighted in the pomp and pageantry of his position, he harbored no political ambitions, which kept him free from suspicion -- for a time. When Trujillo tired of him, an investigation into his affairs revealed graft on a large scale. In May 1955 he was imprisoned; later he was exiled, where he rendezvoused with the seven million dollars he had secreted abroad.

The Dominican exile community feverishly plotted to overthrow Trujillo. During the first six months of 1947, one thousand soldiers of fortune mustered on the Cayo Confites islet on the north coast of Cuba -- whose government and President, Dr. Ramon Gras, quietly aimed a blind eye, if not a blessing, in their direction -- and planned an invasion of the Dominican Republic. Before they could set sail, however, Cuban authorities, acting under pressure from its hemisphere partners, including the United States, to whom Trujillo had issued protests, rounded up the revolutionaries (they were later released), and seized their arms, equipment, and aircraft.

Undaunted, the forces reassembled, first in Costa Rica, then in Guatemala, from which they launched an abortive air attack on June 18, 1948. Of six planes that took off, only one managed to land on the Dominican coast -- near Puerto Plata. Ten expeditionaries aboard were killed; five were taken prisoner (and pardoned two months later) -- which prompted to Trujillo to announce on June 20th: "I am still here and those who tried to overthrow me are dead." (Crassweller, p.241)

Seemingly beset by enemies, Trujillo increased the size of his Army to 18,000, a number singularly disproportionate to the significance of the country in the Hemisphere. He controlled the high command the same way he controlled his subordinates: diluting it among several contenders, who were subjected to promotion and demotion with maddening irrationality.


Declining to run for a fifth Presidential term, in the early summer of 1951, Trujillo nominated the most docile and reliable of his six brothers, Negro, most recently, General of the Army, to replace him. His swearing in on August 16, 1952, was strictly symbolic; he was not permitted to make a public address, and he followed his brother out of the Palace after the latter had been accorded the highest honors in a ritualistic ceremony.

The regime firmly entrenched, Trujillo spent much of the next three years out of the country -- making a spectacular entrance as delegate to the United Nations, trailing a retinue of twelve guards and aides in his wake, posing as a staunch anti-Communist; conferring with President Eisenhower in Washington, D.C.; witnessing the victory of his national polo team, captained by his son Ramfis, at Delray Beach, Florida; visiting Madrid, where, in fact, he was intimidated by the elegance and richness of the Spanish culture and the grand pronouncements of his host, Generalissimo Franco; bowing before Pope Pius XII, "eulogizing the faith and expressing the devotion of the Dominican people to Rome"; returning again to the United States for stops in New York, Washington, New Orleans, and Jacksonville -- in a whirlwind of activity. (Crassweller, p. 272)

On August 16, 1954, Trujillo proclaimed "The Year of the Benefactor," and awarded himself the "Great Collar of the Fatherland," studded with twenty-five jewels, one for each year of his reign. His family members were similarly honored. His wife Dona Maris was christened "Woman of the Americas" during a meeting of the Pan-American Round Table in the Dominican capital. Ramfis at twenty-seven was promoted to a lieutenant general. Twelve-year-old Rhadames Trujillo was memorialized by a newly-erected bridge spanning the Ozama River.


In 1955 Trujillo stood at the summit of his era. No new threats were visible from abroad. Vice-President Nixon had paid his respects in March in his Caribbean tour. The nation's economy was dynamic and sound, its budget having grown from $7 million in 1930 to $120 million. The capital had been transformed into a clean and modern city, with impressive boulevards and public buildings, like the Palace of Fine Arts and the Palace of Justice. A water supply system extended into every town and hamlet. One hundred new churches, sixty new hospitals, three-hundred-eighty new bridges, and eighteen hundred miles of new highway dotted the landscape. Fifty new agricultural colonies were in operation
.

Responding to a diplomat commenting on the progress of the last twenty-five years, Trujillo said: "I have done it all by myself, all by myself." (Crassweller, p.290)

On December 20, 1955, the curtain rose in Ciudad Trujillo on a lavish World's Fair dedicated to Rafael Trujillo and his contributions to Dominican life. Forty-two nations participated. Dignitaries from around the world eulogized the man and his country. His twenty-three-foot-tall bronze equestrian statue, his five stars, and enough busts and portraits of him to fill a museum dominated every street and vista of the fairgrounds -- including the Temple of Peace, a vast Coney Island imported from the United States, and a $1 million Fountain of Music. His daughter Angelita was crowned the Queen -- modeling an $80,000 jewel-encrusted gown, carrying a $75,000 scepter and brooch, and escorted by 140 attendants. (Crassweller, p. 290)

In a heavily gold-braided uniform topped by plumed bicorne, Trujillo reviewed parade after parade, never tiring of listening to one sycophant after another deliver speeches of homage.


But the fair cost $30 million, almost a third of the nations' budget, and produced little revenue, attracting neither investment nor visitors, other than a few dignitaries, one of whom, U. S army commander W. K. Harrison, would be suitably impressed. "I feel that the Dominican people have every right to be proud othe inspired and forceful leadership of His Excellency Rafael Trujillo Molina," he wrote in the visitors' guest book.

In a sense, the great fair foreshadowed a decline, for beneath all the extravagant glitter was the rottenness of a "tyranny whose constructive aspects would fade away into megalomania and whose every despotism would endure and increase." (Crassweller, p. 299.)


The symbol of an intensified reign of terror was a violent, depraved brute named Johnny Abbes. Abbes learned his trade -- espionage and political subversion -- working in the Embassy in Mexico, where one of his duties was to monitor the activities of Dominican exiles. Trujillo discovered his talents, became infatuated by the man -- granting him personal access at all times -- and appointed him Chief of the notorious SIM, the Military Intelligence Service. Under Abbes, the SIM expanded enormously, bringing under its umbrella political surveillance, censorship, passport and immigration control, and foreign operations and subversion -- including an attempted assassination of the President of Costa Rica, probably the assassination of the President of Guatemala (although the suspicions are unconfirmed), and the attempted overthrow of the government of Honduras.

The rise of Fidel Castro posed new dangers for Trujillo -- the deposed Fulgencio Batista took refuge in the Dominican Republic before fleeing to Portugal -- and he was quick to respond, levying a special tax, raising a $50 million defense fund, and, detrimentally, dealing a serious blow to the country's economic health.

His fears were not unfounded. On June 14, 1959, a C-46 plane which had been furnished by Venezuela took off from a Cuban air base with fifty-six fighting men aboard. Landing at Constanza, in the Cordillera Central, the attackers were soon repulsed; a handful of survivors fled onto the wild mountain country. Six days later, two invading yachts, escorted to within a few miles off shore by Cuban frigates, were destroyed by the Dominican Air Force at Puerto Plata, killing all aboard.

The invasions of 1959 were the product not only of foreign meddling and exile plotting, but also of extensive underground activity in the Dominican Republic. In retaliation, repression and vengeance descended on large segments of the population. Families were dislocated. Many persons lost their jobs. Physical persecutions reached a new intensity. Higher taxes on rice, meat, and salt added to the general resentment. Corruption and graft were widespread. (Crassweller, p. 359)

The growing dissident movement took its name, 1J4 (Catorce de Junio), from the date of the June failure. Students, businessmen, physicians, farmers, engineers, even seminarists, many in their twenties and thirties, formed conspiratorial cells, approached the Venezuelan government for arms and munitions, and mapped out the Dominican coastline for clandestine landing strips. They set January 21, 1960, as the day to blow up Trujillo at his cattle farm.

When information leaked out a day before the planned the assassination, Trujillo and Abbes struck back with unprecedented vengeance. Four thousand persons were arrested, some of whom were sentenced to prison for up to thirty years. Most were sons and daughters of upper and middle-class families, including three men married to the beautiful Mirabel sisters, Maria Theresa, Minerva Argentina, and Patricia Mercedes.


One of the sisters had reportedly resisted Trujillo's amorous advances with a stinging slap in the face. Incensed by their independence and disaffection, in November Trujillo ordered Johnny Abbes to "terminate the Mirabel problem." On the afternoon of November 25th, on their homeward journey after bringing food and clean clothing to their imprisoned husbands in the fortress of Puerto Plata, the three women were kidnapped in their own jeep by SIM agents. Turning off the main road, the abductors stopped beside a clump of sugar cane at the edge of a deep ravine, dragged the victims to separate corners of the field, and clubbed them to death. They threw the bodies in the jeep, and drove it off a precipice to make the murder appear to have been a tragic accident.

But the unmistakable Trujillo imprint could not be so easily eradicated. Nor would it be passively tolerated as just one more in a series of brutal crimes. It generated national outrage, focused the world's attention on the depths of the dictator's depravity, and tempered the resolution of those committed to his demise.

The government tried to shore up the regime. Low cost homes and more hospitals were built. Trujillo began attending baptisms on a regular basis. In a series of spurious political moves, Trujillo resigned as leader and member of the Dominican Party. Negro stepped aside in favor of the scholarly, religious, austere Dr. Joaquin Belaguer. A bogus campaign to return Trujillo to the Presidency was orchestrated over the airwaves, in letters, and at public gatherings. Trujillo ran for and was elected Governor of the Santiago Province, pretending to have put national affairs behind him, and immediately declined to serve.

For years Trujillo had harbored an antipathy towards Romulo Betancourt of Venezuela, originating in Betancourt's association with Dominican exiles, but evolving over time into a deep-seated, personal hatred, until, by 1959, it had advanced to the level of a pathological obsession. When Betancourt was elected President in 1958, Trujillo tried to undermine his government; when that failed and Betancourt protested to the Organization of American States, Trujillo became infuriated. On June 24, 1960, a remote detonator exploded a car just as Betancourt's Cadillac was passing by. Badly burned on his hands, arms, and face, Betancourt survived. But the international repercussions were traumatic.



Two months later, Foreign Ministers of the Hemisphere condemned the participation of the Dominican Government in acts of aggression and intervention against Venezuela. They agreed to the complete breaking of diplomatic relations and to the partial interruption of economic relations with the Dominican Republic by all member states.

Because a single man, corrupted by thirty years of absolute power, had sworn death to his enemy, the Dominican Republic lost the support of the United States, ending the relationship that had long been the central pillar of its foreign policy; it was expelled from the family of nations that comprised the New World; and, possibly for the first time in history, collective sanctions were imposed against a nation in a time of peace because of its aggression towards another. (Crassweller, p. 419.)

Further evidence of Trujillo's erratic mentality was the scandalous campaign he instigated against the Catholic Church early in 1960 when it refused to grant him the title "Benefactor of the Church."

The United States, fearful that deteriorating economic conditions in the Dominican Republic as a result of the sanctions would become a breeding ground for a Communist revolution, encouraged -- and may have abetted -- the assassination of the dictator for whom, thirty years ago, they had created an Army.

Its disenchantment with Trujillo was on full display in a letter dated October 27, 1960, from consul general Henry Dearborn (the embassy had been downgraded to a consulate general following the Venezuelan affair) to his superior in Washington. Dearborn wrote: "If I were Dominican, which thank heaven I am not, I would favor destroying Trujillo as being the first necessary step in the salvation of the country, and I would regard this, in fact, as my Christian duty." Three weeks earlier the CIA had issued its "Plans for the Dominican Internal Opposition and Dominican Desk for the Overthrow of the Trujillo Government"; it provided for the delivery of three hundred rifles and ammunition to a site fourteen miles east of Cuidad Trujillo.

While this never happened, three CIA-supplied .38 caliber Smith & Wesson pistols and three .30 caliber M-1 carbines with clips and ammunition eventually fell into the hands of a cabal, despite a May 29th cable from Washington to Dearborn warning ". . . we must not run risk of U. S. association with political assassination, since U. S. as matter of general policy cannot condone assassination. This last principle is overriding and must prevail in doubtful situation."

On the evening of May 30, 1961, after his ritualistic evening walk from his residence down to the sea and a ninety minute round trip to the San Isidro air force base accompanied by his armed forces secretary, Trujillo settled into the back seat of his 1957 curtained, four-door, light-blue Belair Chevrolet with a briefcase full of government papers and $110,000 in cash, and instructed his chauffeur, Captain Zacarias de la Cruz, to take him to his hacienda in San Cristobal. He had no telephone or escort, other than three submachine guns and several revolvers.

As his car passed the Agua Luz Theater, four men lounging beside a black Chevrolet specially equipped with a powerful engine scrambled aboard, and set off in rapid pursuit. From the front seat, Antonio de la Maza, brother of the aforementioned scapegoat and purported suicide, leveled a sawed-off Remington shotgun and fired through the prey car's curtained rear window. Hearing a cry of surprise from the Generalissimo -- "Cono, I've been hit!" -- Zacarias turned to look when a second blast struck him in the shoulder. The Trujillo car braked to a halt, while the chase car swung around to the opposite side of the road; the two faced each other like ancient battleships.

Zacarias shouted that they needed to make a run back to the capital, but when the wounded Trujillo lurched for the back door, revolver in hand and intent upon retaliation, he grabbed a machine gun and opened fire on the assassins, who by now had bolted their own car and flattened themselves on the pavement. Angered by the fusillade and fearing his quarry might escape, de la Maza lunged across the fifty-foot gap. He saw the bent form of a man still wearing his military cap weaving in and out of the light from his car's headlights. He aimed at point blank range and pulled the trigger. Trujillo emerged in the eerie light, staggered first toward San Cristobal, then toward Ciudad Trujillo, and then fell face forward.

De la Maza approached the body and angrily kicked the corpse over on its back. Pronouncing a brief eulogy -- "This hawk won't kill any more chickens" -- he seized Trujillo's gun and delivered the coup de grace: one more bullet that shattered his jaw, dislodged a dental bridge, and lodged behind his left ear.

The four-minute firefight left all four assailants wounded and a light-blue Chevrolet riddled with fifty-two bullet holes.

A chronological narrative hardly does justice to the megalomania of the man and the tyranny of his regime.

The Dominican despot was a unique phenomenon, no ordinary human being. Every personality trait was "in some measure or degree a buttress for the central arch of his being, the power instinct." (Crassweller, p. 73)

He had tremendous energy of body and will, a disciplined and controlled energy, often rising at 4:00 AM, informing himself of all recent developments within the country and the world before he reached his office at 9:00, where he spent a grueling nine or ten hours at his desk, working longer and harder than any of his subordinates. (Ornes, p. 74)

An intense desire for money reinforced his will to power. He possessed an abiding faith in its potency, and believed it the primary motivator of human behavior, and that every man and thing had its price. (Crassweller, p. 74)

Related to his drive for power was his sense of ego, an extraordinary need for adulation and the proliferation of his name, reflecting not just a preternatural vanity but an awareness of how it could be used politically (Crassweller, p. 74).

Trujillo regarded himself as an instrument of God, a chosen man with a great mission to perform. He longed for people to fawn on him and call him the greatest humanitarian ever. Praising the Generalissimo at every opportunity became a must, and certainly a requirement for any Dominican seeking advancement (Ornes, p. 78).

Among the scores of titles Trujillo collected were: Benefactor of the Fatherland; Generalissimo of all Armed Forces; First and Greatest of the Dominican Chiefs of State; Restorer of the Financial Independence of the State; Liberator of the Nation; and Protector of the Beaux Arts and Letters (Ornes, p. 228)

By common consent the Chief was the country's preeminent statesman, journalist, hero, teacher, man of justice, guardian of the people, and genius of thought. Eighteen hundred busts were erected overlooking parks, streets, colleges, hospitals, and offices throughout the country. Every town, sports event, or billiard game had to be dedicated to the Benefactor of the Fatherland. The humblest dirt-floor hut bore the sign: "In this house Trujillo is Chief." Three national holidays were proclaimed for him: the date of his birth, the date he was first elected President, and the date the capital's name was changed. (Ornes, pp. 228-229)

Elevated to the status of a science, the deification of the Benefactor under the slogan "God and Trujillo" reached its apogee with this 1955 acclamation in La Nacion: "Men are not indispensable. But Trujillo is irreplaceable. For Trujillo is not a man. He is a political force. An economic force. A social force . . . A cosmic force . . . Those who try to compare him to his ordinary contemporaries are mistaken. He belongs to the category of those born to a special destiny." (Ornes, p. 6)


Trujillo's love of finery both sustained his ego and elevated his status before the country peasants and the working class. He was meticulously vain about his person and his wardrobe. He owned four hundred pairs of shoes, two thousand suits and uniforms, a world renowned collection of ten thousand neckties, and several gold-braided, ostrich-plumed white hats, which he considered the supreme symbols of his rank. (Crassweller, p.78)

Other essential elements of his power pattern were a deep and universal distrust of associates and acquaintances (he had no real friends) and an instinct for secrecy and unpredictability. The relationships he did have were manipulative. His subordinates never knew when a sudden change would undercut their very existence. A surprise promotion could be just as unsettling, since it was so detached from the usual sequence of cause and effect that it was no less a source of insecurity than the loss of employment. (Crassweller, p.76)


Trujillo's appetite for women was legendary, and can be viewed as another instrument of power. He enjoyed a steady supply, probably thousands, divided between those who had no objection to being discovered and presented to him and those who had to be pressured or induced into availability by eager patrons seeking to win his favor. He made his selections from a group of thirty brought to him twice a week, and generally slept with them once or twice. Women who tried to resist might find their reputations vilified, their employment terminated, or their families similarly persecuted.


Trujillo was no revolutionary. Unlike other twentieth-century totalitarian dictators, he professed no social philosophy, no political ideology, no theoretical doctrine. To him, politics was not a system; it was an outlet for his megalomania, and the apparatus by which he acquired, retained, and exercised absolute power. Pragmatic to the extreme, he was at various times a friend of the Nazis, an apologist for the Soviet Union, a champion of the Church, and a voluble anti-Communist. (Ornes, p. 86)

For thirty years Trujillo ruled the Dominion Republic with a complete absence of scruples, institutionalizing terror in place of any democratic principles or human freedoms. One would be hard-pressed to find an atrocity that was not committed either by him or in his name by others as amoral and immoral as he was: arrest, kidnapping, imprisonment without trial, torture, exile, death, starvation, government-inflicted poverty. Since such punishments could be meted out merely for speaking against the regime, enthusiastic approval of the Benefactor was one's safest recourse, while indiscriminate distrust was commonplace, since any person could turn out to be an informer.

The regime implemented typical totalitarian methods to subdue the population. Every person over sixteen had to carry an identification card. All businessmen had to register with the government, and the right of any citizen to practice his profession was subject to the unconditional judgment of the President. Army check points were established every twenty-five miles on roads throughout the country. All mail was opened in transit and wiretapping was routine. Peasants needed a permit to relocate -- although they could be forcibly uprooted from a tract of land needed for Trujillo's sugar plantations.

A vast network of internal Secret Service agents classified all residents as suspected subversives and kept them under surveillance, using a far-flung network of spies and informers -- many of them domestic servants. Fifty civilians at the Palace of Communications manned bulky radios and tape recorders designed to intercept and record domestic and foreign phone conversations. Torture was commonplace at an interrogation center stocked with all the requisite equipment, including an electric chair purchased from Venezuela. Men of talent or potential prominence were enticed to collaborate or subject to persecution or imprisonment. (Ornes, pp. 103-107)

Trujillo turned the Dominican state into a personal business, a "merciless capitalist enterprise of which he was the sole proprietor, " (De Galindez, p. xxi) and built for himself an immense fortune. From the outset, his government was a regime of plunder, employing its extensive powers of legislation, taxation, customs collections, and quantitative regulations -- plus the criminal tactics of thievery, embezzlement, bribery, and blackmail -- to facilitate his infiltration and control of all economic enterprises in the country and funnel their revenues into his private coffers, his family's, or those of his military and civilian henchmen. (Ornes, p. 235)

With the proceeds from his army pilfering, even before he came to power, Trujillo acquired his first cattle farm, which would grow exponentially into the largest real estate holding in the country. Cattle lands yield meat and dairy products, and within a short time he had cobbled together first meat and milk monopolies, then rice and salt monopolies, sharply boosting the domestic prices of all these staples. Owners of the country's largest insurance company and tobacco factory were coerced into selling to him.

His wife acquired a bank at which government employees were strongly encouraged to cash their paychecks -- before payday, and for a discount.

Other businesses which Trujillo owned or controlled, through dummy corporations or family or crony proxies, included: glassware, edible oils, alcoholic beverages, textiles, firearms, pharmaceuticals, footwear, furniture, meat packing, shipping, and the representation of American manufacturers in the Dominican Republic.

Trujillo came late to the sugar business. He began buying sugar mills in 1948, when the price of sugar rose to five cents a pound. After building one of the largest sugar mills in the world at Rio Haina, he discovered that he did not have enough sugar cane to feed it. Through blackmail, intimidation, and physical dispossession, nearby landowners, large and small, were forced to sell out. Trujillo's sugar corporations were awarded tax exemptions, watered by government irrigation projects, accessed by government-built roads, and manned with soldiers, convicts, and forced labor. When the price of sugar fell, Trujillo sold his sugar holdings to a government bank for $50 million in cash, later buying them back on generous credit terms. By 1957 Trujillo dominated 70 per cent of the domestic sugar industry.

By the end of his life, Trujillo, the reigning family, or their surrogates figured as major stockholders of practically every profitable corporation in the country. They controlled nearly 80 per cent of the country's industrial production and employed 45 per cent of the active labor force, which, combined with the 15 per cent who worked for the state, meant that 60 per cent of Dominican families depended on his will. (Pons, p. 365)

With every product a person bought, domestic or imported, lining the Benefactor's pockets, with a system of taxes and compulsory contributions to the Dominican Party skimming off more accessible revenues, Trujillo's empire was generating for him personally an annual income of $36 million, and perhaps another $15 million for those who administered it -- an amount equal to the combined national expenditures for education, public health, labor, social security, and public works. At his death, in 1961, he had accumulated total wealth estimated at one-half a billion dollars.

Whether or not, as his propaganda machine trumpeted, it should be attributed to his leadership, one cannot deny that the Dominican Republic experienced significant material progress during his rule. The number of manufacturing outlets tripled, while output increased ten times from 1935 to 1954. Industrialization transformed the administrative character of the capital, luring tens of thousands of workers from the countryside to the city, many of whom, however, lacking education, joined the ranks of the marginalized unemployed.

Ambitious construction programs saw a proliferation of ports, highways, airports, bridges, irrigation works, public buildings, churches, and housing projects. Health services and sanitation improved dramatically, making urban life more attractive, reducing the mortality rate, and fostering greater fertility among Dominican women. School enrollment increased ten times, although the prescribed curriculum invariably included a thorough indoctrination in the cult of hero-worship and in the infallibility, wisdom, and benevolence of Rafael Trujillo.

But the stark truth is that a very small portion of the population shared in the country's putative material progress. While the few who enjoyed the good graces of the Benefactor got richer, many more got poorer -- as a consequence of the inflated prices of the commodities controlled by the family monopolies, the shortage of jobs as foreign investors, fearful of government appropriation, fled the country, and the onerous excise and indirect taxes which further reduced the standard of living.

Just as tragic a legacy as pervasive poverty, urban blight, and rural displacement -- as tragic as the persecutions and violence, the extortions and peculations -- were the attrition of the Dominican soul, the destruction of the Dominican spirit, the triumph of universal despair, the erosion of human respect and dignity, and the corruption of public morals through fear and suspicion -- in a place where every neighbor was a spy; where the most one could hope for was to attract the approving nod of the Dictator and get rich as fast as possible; where every man had to remove his hat in the Dictator's presence; where only two words had definite meaning, uncertainty and terror; and where, at the proper time and place, each subject had to pay dutiful homage by reciting the pagan panegyric: Thanks to God and Trujillo. (Ornes, p. 4)

Today Dominicans celebrate the date of Trujillo's assassination as a national holiday.

REFERENCES

Crassweller, Robert D. Trujillo: The Life and Times of a Caribbean Dictator. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1966.

Diederich, Bernard. Trujillo: The Death of the Dictator. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2000.

Galindez, Jesus de. The Era of Trujillo. Tucson, Arizona: The University of Arizona Press, 1973.

Moya Pons, Frank. The Dominican Republic: A National History. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 1998.

Ornes, German E. Trujillo: Little Caesar of the Caribbean. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1958.






Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A Dirty Little Secret

I have a dirty little secret. (Actually, I have several, but common sense and propriety dictate that I keep the others to myself.)

I like to move furniture.

And I'm not talking about moving it out the back doors of Schewel's fifty-one retail stores after it's been purchased (but not necessarily paid for, since Schewel finances over 80% of those purchases), although that's what keeps me in business. I'm talking about schlepping (as my grandfather would say, and often do): shifting, sliding, rolling, and carrying sofas, chairs, beds, mattresses, and tables around inside those stores, sometimes with a little help, more often without -- in a pathological exhibition of the pleasures of solitude, although there is an ulterior motive to this madness, which will be disclosed in good time.

Such a revelation will no doubt confirm the assessment of a brutally honest friend who, after reading my last blog and noting my consumption of 2500 books, accosted me at the Country Club a few nights ago and called me a "sick man."

In response to which I maintain: Work and play are relative terms. Or as more felicitously expressed by the proverbial rationalist: One man's meat is another man's poison.

Some people's passionate retreat is their kitchen -- a place as cold and foreign to me as the Antarctic continent where my eighty-four-year-old mother has now flown to escape winter's wrath -- where they delight in the preparation of culinary masterpieces for their family and friends.

Others rejoice in the seeding, nurturing, and maturation of luxuriant plant life, whether it be of the aesthetically-pleasing or utilitarian-nutritional variety.

Closely related are those who find fulfillment in the exquisitely manicured, habitually fertilized, and faithfully watered lawns and shrubs gracing their private domains, the maintenance of which I abhor with a vengeance and have gratefully consigned to a professional service -- for a steep price.

And, of course, I would be egregiously remiss if I omitted from this catalogue of leisure-time dilettantes the superabundant roster of those who revel in more competitive pursuits, like golf or tennis -- both of which I, lacking the prerequisite hand-eye coordination, abandoned long ago -- or in stalking (and slaying) the gentle (and elusive) four-legged, two-winged, scaly-backed fauna of field, air, and stream.

All of these aversions I blame on my gene pool. I never saw my father cook a meal, tend a garden, operate a lawn mower, or wield a rifle or fishing rod.

Compared to these rather tedious activities, how much more compelling, invigorating, and satisfying it is to immerse oneself in a little manual labor and perfect a furniture store display -- at least according to my own creative standards. And since I am the owner, few dare question my design predilections.

The process goes something like this.

I pass through the portals of the store I have chosen to bless with my presence that day somewhat apprehensive about the encounter that lies ahead -- as skittish as a newly-divorced sixty-something going on a first date. In what condition will I find the lucky lady? To be fair, most of my managers keep their displays neat, clean, and orderly, minimally accessorized (to avoid shrinkage as well as breakage, particularly by a rampaging bull from the corporate office), with merchandise soldiered up (as in drill formation -- the way we like it) by category -- upholstery groupings, bedrooms, and dining sets territorily segregated like schoolchildren from a bygone era. But our loosely-disciplined (or entrepreneurially-spirited, as some prefer) system does pose minor challenges.

Schewel managers are not furnished a professionally-designed graphic floor plan for their stores -- a template to which they can refer for the placement of merchandise. While most make an honest effort to maintain the display that was set at the store's opening or during an extreme makeover, not only are they granted the freedom to alter it, they must also add, subtract, and reshuffle, like a gin rummy player, as merchandise moves on and off the floor, the new pieces not always fitting the space vacated by the old. As a result, like an army corps breaking ranks, the display tends to deteriorate, to lose its edge -- at least in the eye of one very important beholder.

In other words, it's passable -- just not the way I like it.

Next, like a quarterback crouched in the shotgun dissecting his opponents' defensive alignment, I survey the floor, evaluating the situation, formulating a plan, determining just how much furniture I want to move in the four or five hours remaining that day. Because I always adhere to two strict rules. Don't start until you know where you are going to end up, lest you subject yourself to painful and time-consuming backtracking. And always finish the job, because, if you don't, the untidy corner you leave behind can spoil all your well-intentioned efforts.

In the face of this daunting task, I am teased with the provocative thought: How much easier would it be to print off a computer report or two, hoist a heavy stack of papers, scatter a few well-deserved compliments, offer the manager some positive feedback -- and then high-tail it back out the front door with clean hands and unsullied clothing. But, girding my strength, steeling my nerves, conquering my inertia, I march boldly back to the warehouse, grab a two-wheeled hand truck -- for toting sofas, loveseats, and chests of drawers (the rest of the stuff has to be dragged or pushed across the floor) -- and move that first piece of furniture. And suddenly the energy starts to flow; the pace quickens; the vision clarifies; the stress dissipates.

Although a helper is usually available, often I choose to work alone -- provided the quantities and weight are manageable -- for two reasons. First, anxious to impress the owner, these eager beavers are just too quick to grab the end of a sofa, which necessitates me lifting the other end, whereas it's much less strenuous to push it a short distance or roll it on the hand truck to a more distant destination. Secondly, these impetuous fellows are always anticipating the next move or placement, requiring me to slow them down or follow in their wake to rearrange an item.

I'm not a decorator or designer -- and don't claim to be able to create scintillating displays. I'm just a compulsive furniture store owner who likes to see the merchandise in his stores square and trim, lined up like soldiers in full-dress review, with broad straight aisles and no unsightly naked dresser backs exposed. And it gives me a sense of accomplishment to see disorder transformed into perfection -- if only for a few days.

And I guess there are points to be earned when the boss deigns to dirty himself performing manual labor in front of and alongside his employees.

The truth is I've been moving furniture for over forty years.

What's a teenager to do when his father informs him the first summer he's old enough to obtain a permit that he's going to work? He lacks the self-confidence to sell, to small-talk his way past his woeful ignorance of furniture style, finish, and construction. Even if he wasn't flustered and intimidated by the brassy women he would be working with, by the time he learned any of the paperwork, his seasonal stint would be over. His mathematical proficiency is wasted since the store lacks even a rudimentary inventory control system.

Abandoned to his own resources, cast adrift in a sea of sofas, he aimlessly wanders the upper floors of this four-story furniture store until he is drawn into the orbit of his polar opposite, a black, glib, illiterate dandy named Henry Jackson, who, when not regaling him with salacious tales of his sexual exploits, instructs him in the finer points of floor display and stock management.

In those days, the Schewel store in Downtown Lynchburg used unfinished space attached to its third and fourth floors to warehouse upholstery. Once or twice a day during those sweltering summer months Henry and I would maneuver four-wheeled dollies topped with sofabeds and two-piece living room suites (sofas and chairs only, no loveseats) in close-out covers (the factory picked them, which saved a few dollars of cost) out of the freight elevator (into which they had been rolled by another crew manning the loading dock several floors below) and into the warehouse.

Once the truck had been unloaded, since my father insisted the display floor be packed with as much merchandise as possible, we immediately went to work: bolting the arms to the sofabeds, screwing on the legs (when we could find the holes, which were often buried beneath multiple layers of cloth undercoating), ripping off the heavy brown wrapping paper (which seemed to be attached to the frames with more staples than the upholstery); tearing loose the fabric cords holding the cushions in place, and then wheeling the presentable product onto the floor. Henry delighted in its proper placement, which involved ingenuity, patience, and labor, since often several pieces had to be scrambled to make room for the new ones.

Every morning Henry (and I) walked the three upper display floors, searching for the odious vacancy -- left behind when a salesman may have moved an item to accommodate a customer or the "shipping department" (not us; we were "warehouse") craftily whisked away a sold order without notifying us. We exercised our own brand of chicanery, studiously avoiding my grandfather, "Mr. Ben" Schewel, who had his own ideas about store display and was always chasing Henry to help him implement them.

Things hadn't changed much by the time I went to work for Schewel full time (though temporarily, that is, until a better opportunity came along) -- except I received a promotion. I was supposed to sell -- a higher calling than moving furniture -- but since my interpersonal skills had only marginally improved -- despite four years at Washington and Lee University and one teaching English at Appomattox County High School -- I availed myself of the perquisite of being the boss's son (and later the boss) and gravitated to doing what I liked: maintaining the floor display (My biggest issues were where to place loveseats, since we didn't carry that many and they took up a lot of space, and whether to set up beds with mattresses and box springs or simply bolt the headboards and footboards together with a clever device known as a "short-rail"); tagging merchandise (which allowed me to become more familiar with it); and managing inventory, trying to keep up with what was selling (a futile effort, since inventory control consisted of marking off numbers on the price tag as stock was sold, a system fraught with errors, as it depended on the diligence and reliability of the salesperson).

Pacing the floors, contemplating my career, inspired by my Washington and Lee Phi Beta Kappa education, I began to imagine that there must be a better way. If, through some judicious buying decisions, we could identify a core group of items that sold well, we could stock those in our warehouse and sell them repeatedly, thus eliminating the need to shuffle our floor display constantly. Without accurate inventory control, this process would depend on considerable guesswork, but at least it would be an improvement and conserve valuable muscle power and time.

Such a system was not rocket science and, in fact, was already in operation on a limited basis. As my father began delegating purchasing authority to me, I endeavored to refine the strategy. I made mistakes, of course, like buying twelve of a quilted floral print Early American living room suite on which I had no sales history and watching them sit idle like cars in a traffic jam month after month.

In 1976, after six years cutting my teeth in the Lynchburg store, my father put me on the road supervising five stores in the Shenandoah Valley. Suddenly, I had not just one display floor to look after; I had a whole handful. A world of painful pleasure lay before me.

At least twice a month I made the circuit -- Harrisonburg to Luray to Winchester to Front Royal to Culpeper -- meeting with managers (all of whom had at least ten years experience on me); discussing personnel issues; perusing recently sold sales contracts; writing orders; reviewing newspaper ads; checking out warehouses; and, yes, changing floor displays to make them more attractive -- to me.

Furniture is big, bulky, and perishable, that is, easily damaged, all of which requires high cubic foot off-site storage facilities, competent assembly, repair, and preparation personnel, and efficient delivery service to the customer. It is a business in which logistics -- moving the product -- is the critical component, although, as you might imagine, the most desirable logistical system is the one that moves that product the least and minimizes changing the floor displays -- by the owner or anyone else. In my forty years with the company, Schewels has made tremendous improvement in this area, yet its system still lacks the sophistication of other high volume operations.

Two practices which today are taken for granted were no less than revolutionary -- and like many revolutions stridently opposed -- when they were instituted thirty years ago: a uniform selection or line-up of merchandise for sale in all stores, and centralized warehousing and distribution. Before their advent, Schewel managers took great pride in choosing the particular upholstery or bedroom groups they wanted to carry (or some did; I suspect others merely asked the manufacturer's representative what his peer down the road was buying) and in determining the appropriate quantities of each to stock -- a matter in which, it is safe to say, judgment varied considerably.

But as Schewel grew from twelve stores in 1976 to twenty-five in 1986, and as business increased in each location, the impracticality and limitations of stores operating as independent entities became obvious to even the most hidebound traditionalist. Some were probably relieved when the responsibility for making bad buying decisions was lifted off their shoulders. That now became the burden of the boss's son, who once again boldly exercised his prerogative of being able to do what he liked: pick out furniture for his stores.

While a standardized line-up simplified the buying process and allowed the company to produce print advertisements featuring merchandise supposedly on display in all stores, the permanence of that display and the availability of best-sellers were still dependent upon managerial discretion and the spatial restrictions of each warehouse. Thus, the next step in the company's logistical evolution was the establishment of distribution centers which were capable of receiving and storing large truckload shipments and then transferring sold or stock items to individual stores as necessary.

For a time Schewel operated three strategically-placed distribution centers, actually three large warehouses, two of which served the company's biggest markets, Lynchburg and Danville, while a third building was purchased in Harrisonburg.

This arrangement enabled stores to "nail down" their samples, sell against inventory on hand or on order in the distribution center, and reduce the movement of furniture on and off the floor, although mangers still had the option of relinquishing any piece to a customer demanding instant gratification.

At the same time that Schewel was transitioning into central warehousing and distribution, it waded into the murky swamp of automated inventory control -- this in a time when the Internet, pc's, laptops, and e-mail were not even figments of Al Gore's imagination and the word computer was more frightening than "Jaws" to office clerks and managers. The primitive system Schewel installed was sku-based, paper-plentiful, batch-configured -- and inordinately susceptible to error. It entailed an exorbitant investment of human and financial resources -- with minimal payback. Nevertheless, I adopted its success as a personal crusade -- devoting countless hours to taking and retaking physical inventories, training store personnel, sifting through stacks of sales orders in a futile attempt to identify and correct mistakes -- not because I was enamored of or proficient with computers (I wasn't then nor am I now) but because I saw inventory control as an essential merchandising tool. Accurate stock counts and rates of sale would yield better buying decisions.

Obviously, in servicing multiple locations, the more product that can be housed under one roof, the more efficient will be the operation. Which is why in 1986 Schewel consolidated its three bulk storage warehouses into one 75,000 (later expanded to 90,000) sq. ft., 30 ft. tall, seven-level-racked distribution center in Lynchburg. While it experienced routine growing pains during its formative years, thanks now to a professional management team, every year $50 million worth of furniture, appliances, and electronics flows smoothly through its twenty-five dock doors -- as eighty containers and trucks are unloaded weekly, the contents of which are bar coded and transported by order picker or forklift to bulk storage or locator racks, from which it is picked, checked, and reloaded onto transfer tractor-trailers bound for satellite stores twice a week in response to those stores' overnight downloaded requisitions.

Other large regional chains -- like Rooms To Go, Raymour-Flanigan, and City Furniture -- bypass the transfer step -- and thus move their furniture even less. No merchandise is taken off the sales floor -- unless it's a discontinued item which is immediately replaced by a new one. Employing sophisticated technology, from their massive distribution centers (which can range up to 500,000 sq. ft.), they deliver orders originating in twenty-five to thirty locations directly to a customer's home and as far as 300 miles -- for a hefty fee, of course. The advantages of such a system are self-evident: expert on-site preparation and repair; fewer damages (as a result of less handling); faster delivery (often the day after the customer's purchase); and the elimination of excess inventory in satellite warehouses.

While recognizing the drawbacks, Schewel has made the decision to retain the transfer model, for several reasons. It operates its stores in rural markets where many customers have access to trucks and are willing to pick up their merchandise (over 50% do), thereby saving themselves an $80 charge. With much lower volume stores than the aforementioned companies, Schewel's density of sales is much more dispersed, which makes direct delivery from a remote warehouse a problematic undertaking. Unlike the new breed of high-volume retailers, Schewel carries appliances and electronics; its stores need on-site storage space, as these are items customers want immediately. Schewel finances 80% of its customers' purchases and must have personnel on hand for those rare occasions when it must make a repossession. And, finally, the development of a centralized retail delivery system would require significant investments in data processing and expanded or redesigned facilities, with uncertain returns.

Which means that, in our stores, lots of people still have to get their hands dirty.

They must unload the trucks bringing sold or new merchandise from the Distribution Center.

Whether it's for delivery or sample, they must slice open the box, peel away the cardboard, and unwrap each piece.

From a myriad of small components, they must assemble almost every dining table, chair, and occasional table, which are shipped flat-packed from the Far East in order to save space on containers. (I've seen four chairs in a carton the size of a serving platter.) They must screw legs on sofas, loveseats, and chairs, and install backs on recliners.

They must inspect all items for rips, dents, scratches, splits, and blemishes, and repair them before they leave the premises.

They must load them on customer vehicles or Schewel delivery trucks, where they must be blanket-wrapped and tied down.

In customers' homes or on the display floor, they must screw hardware on dressers, chests, and chinas, attach mirrors to dressers, and bolt rails to headboards and footboards and slats and center supports to rails.

They must carefully unpack and delicately place glass shelves in dining chinas and curios, lest they look embarrassingly incomplete.

Like a hungry squirrel rooting for a hidden acorn, someone must scour the warehouse, squeezing between sofas and loveseats and crawling over and around cartons of case goods, rummaging for that piece of old or new furniture that yearns to see the light of day on the sales floor.

And since our displays are not "nailed down," as much as we would like them to be, and merchandise comes and goes like a good poker hand, someone must walk around every day and scuffle with a chair or two.

Which is where I come in.

Years ago, when I taught a Junior Achievement Business Class (one hour a week for about ten weeks), I introduced myself by asking the students to name the tasks one would expect to perform in a furniture store. Together, we compiled an extensive list: selling (the most important one, by the way), purchasing, hiring (and firing), training, advertising, delivering, assembling, collecting (customer accounts), negotiating (real estate deals), building (stores), writing business plans. Looking back over forty years in this most unglamorous of careers, I can honestly claim to have spent at least a little time in each of those departments.

And now, having attained the position of CEO of a medium-sized family-owned enterprise, which enables me to delegate all of those duties to someone else, other than having to make a few strategic decisions, I am left with the luxury of doing just about anything.

And so, ten or twelve times a month, I don a casual shirt, khaki pants, and a pair of comfortable rubber-soled buckskin Rockports, drive my company car to a Schewel store I haven't seen in a while and which I think needs my services the most, walk the aisles, grab a hand truck, and -- shush, don't tell anyone, it's a secret -- move a few sofas, chairs, dressers, chests, and tables, until I've got every piece just where I want it.

Because I love the furniture business.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Thriller

I have been an avid reader ever since I discovered the joy of the printed word at age six or seven and progressed from parsing Dick and Jane to deciphering cereal boxes. Who can say what sparked this insatiable hunger, which impelled me to devour books like a rampaging wildfire scorching all in its path or like the ravenous "Book Beast" emblazoned on the tee shirt given to me many years ago by a sister-in-law? Athletically inept, socially dysfunctional, painfully introverted, perhaps I was seeking to compensate for these self-proclaimed deficiencies or steered to things studious and cerebral by some dominant, ancestral gene.

While my peers flexed their muscles on the diamond and gridiron and charmed their way into the good graces of the opposite sex, I buried myself in a warm cocoon of make-believe, and sowed the seeds of my current fixation.


I pass it now every day on my way to work, the once-classically-grand Jones Memorial Library -- a mere shell of its glorious, if scarred, segregated legacy, its yellow-brick facade, white stone staircase and terrace, and imperious cupola still dominating lower Rivermont Avenue with a now-spectral gaze -- the bowels of which I scoured once or twice a week, the lower-level children's section, unearthing well-worn copies of, yes, the Bobbsey Twins (by Laura Lee Hope) and Thornton W. Burgess's one-hundred-plus animal biographies of friendly creatures like Peter Cottontail, Reddy the Fox, Johnny Chuck, and Sammy Jay. While these could hardly be deemed "thrillers," they were replete with enough primitive humor, engaging characters, crazy shenanigans, and precarious situations to keep this young reader enthralled. And they introduced me to the seductiveness of recurring protagonists, familiar personalities whose continuing adventures I was only too eager to sample.

After exhausting most of the titles in these mild-mannered series or simply outgrowing them, I entered into a phase of serious comic-book obsession. While I occasionally scanned a Disney's Mickey Mouse or a Looney Tunes' Bugs Bunny -- and some of their daffy cohorts -- for variety and Classics Illustrated only as a last resort, Superman, Batman, and their well-endowed stablemates -- Aquaman, Green Lantern, and the Flash -- were my heroes of choice; possessing extraordinary powers, consistently able to outwit and out slug their nefarious foes, delineated in living color, they were the video game stars of yesteryear and the real precursors of my adult crusaders.


I remember stacks of comic books, waist-high on an eight-year-old, neatly catalogued by publisher and subject, crowned by the solemn visage of a coonskin-capped Davy Crockett. I remember languidly rocking away a summer afternoon stretched out in a hammock on the back porch of 1226 Greenway Court, tracking the latest flights of Superman. I remember loitering at the magazine counter in Pearson's Drug Store on Boonsboro Road, stealing glances at the newest DC comics monthly editions before being swatted away, loath to expend my allowance on purchasing any, since there were too many for my pocketbook and since the publisher had had the audacity to raise the cover prices from ten cents to twelve cents and then to an exorbitant fifteen cents. I remember at summer camp anxiously awaiting the arrival of the Sunday New York Daily News sent by my father; wrapped in the comic section, it enabled me to follow the exploits of the chisel-faced Dick Tracy as he chased down Joe Period, Flattop Jr., and the Kitten Sisters.


I admired Dick Tracy, but, like other preteens, I could more closely identify with sleuths closer to my age, like the resourceful Hardy Boys, Frank and Joe. In a series of stirring if formulaic episodes, usually after taking a hand-off case from their baffled detective father, Fenton, they found missing chums, uncovered secrets in caves and old mills, deciphered marks on doors and sinister signposts, and solved airport, Shore Road, and hidden harbor mysteries, always narrowly escaping one imminent disaster after another.


By the time I discovered the Hardy Boys in the mid-fifties, at the age of eight, they were already thirty years old, the first three volumes in the series -- The Tower Treasure, The House on the Cliff, and The Secret of the Old Mill -- having been published in 1927, followed by thirty-two more by 1955. How long it took me to circle back and read every one -- as much as possible in order of publication, an eccentricity fostered by the creator's strategy of incorporating into each volume a summary of its predecessor's plot and a teasing introduction to its sequel -- I do not recall. I only know that I did it, up until the age of thirteen, when I finally outgrew these juvenile scribbles and closed my last book on the Hardy Boys, The Mystery of the Desert Giant. I checked them out of the library, or wheedled seventy-five cents or a dollar out of my parents to purchase the ones not available, six or seven of which I noticed a few days ago peeking from the basement bookshelves in the home where I now reside. Only one was still dressed in its artful comic-book cover, the rest nakedly clothbound in tan with brown lettering.

This naive lad reveled in the ingenuity and craftsmanship of one Franklin W. Dixon -- how smoothly his name rolls off the tongue -- Hardy Boys' historian, only to wake up one morning years later, sadly disillusioned, cheated by the shocking revelation that, like Santa Claus, there was no such person. For the Hardy Boys -- and all their youthful partners in crime-solving, Nancy Drew, the Bobbsey Twins, Tom Swift, the Dana Girls -- were the products of one imagination, Edward Stratemeyer (and later his two daughters, Edna and Harriet), and the syndicate he established to churn out these callow potboilers like tabloids off a printing press.

The Stratemeyers' method was to compose detailed ten-to-twelve-page plot outlines and farm them out to ghostwriters, who would submit completed manuscripts for a $100 to $125 stipend, waiving any royalty rights. The real talent behind the Hardy Boys was a struggling young Canadian journalist named Leslie McFarlane, who penned sixteen of the first twenty-four volumes. Often bored by the routine nature of the work and the necessity to conform precisely to the outlines and length dictated by the syndicate, McFarlane still managed to inject ample doses of humor, sophisticated composition, plot complexity, and nuanced characterization into the books, thus accounting in large part for their enduring popularity. Although surpassed in later years by Nancy Drew, the Hardy Boys were racking up sales of one to two million books a year by the time the syndicate was sold in the the early 1980's.

Launched in adolescence, my reading career soared into the stratosphere. Like a homeless man unleashed in Golden Corral, I was eager to sample every salad, entree, side dish, and dessert. High school introduced me to Dickens and Shakespeare (whom I enjoyed but can't say ever read for pleasure); four years as an English major at Washington and Lee served up such delicacies as Sophocles, Wordsworth, Camus, Proust, Faulkner, and Thomas Mann. A trio of history courses even whetted my appetite for narrative history and biography.


As I observed my English professors in their element, not only was their love of literature palpable and contagious, even more intriguing was the realization that they were actually being paid to read books. With this in mind, I accepted a fellowship to Columbia University intending to pursue the scholarly life, until fate (or the Vietnam War) rudely intervened in the form of a notice to report for a draft physical. Abandoning the fellowship, I taught English for one year at Appomattox County High School in order to secure a deferment, and subsequently took a temporary job in the family business -- one that has lasted forty years. (Oddly enough, one of my favorite books is The Best and the Brightest, a title that surely has stood the test of time, David Halberstam's riveting account of how the Kennedy and Johnson Brain Trusts squandered 50,000 lives, billions of dollars, and their own credibility in the quagmire that was Vietnam.)


But my reading fever hardly abated; if anything, it intensified. Freed from the constraints of mandated study, settled into a nine-to-five routine, never enamored of television sitcoms or melodramas, shunning the community volunteer work that was to occupy me in later years, I found a bountiful world of books beckoning me.

My menu was diverse and comprehensive. Harboring illusions of recapturing my fellowship, I tackled classic works missing from my resume: Life on the Mississippi and Huckleberry Finn (Mark Twain); Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov (Dostoyevsky); War and Peace and Anna Karenina (Tolstoy); Jude the Obscure and The Mayor of Casterbridge (Thomas Hardy); Nicholas Nickleby and Our Mutual Friend (Dickens); Portrait of a Lady and The Turn of the Screw (Henry James); and Les Miserables (Victor Hugo).

As academia faded farther into the distance and the search for literary meaning began to grow tiresome, I dove into weighty tomes of non-fiction: Shelby Foote on The Civil War (3 volumes); Bruce Catton on Ulysses S. Grant (2 volumes) and The Army of the Potomac (3 volumes); Dumas Malone on Thomas Jefferson (6 volumes); Winston Churchill on World War II (6 volumes); Allan Nevins on The Ordeal of the Union (8 volumes); Page Smith on the Early American Republic (4 volumes); Geoffrey Ward (2 volumes), Arthur Schlesinger (3 volumes), and Kenneth Davis (5 volumes) on Franklin Roosevelt; Robert Remini on Andrew Jackson (3 volumes); Stephen Oates, David Hugh Donald, and Benjamin Thomas on Abraham Lincoln; Peter Massie on Nicholas and Alexandra and Peter the Great; Barbara Tuchman on The Guns Of August, Admiral Stilwell, and The Calamitous Fourteenth Century; William Shirer on the Third Reich and the Third Republic; Theodore White on The Making of Several Presidents; Ron Chernow on Alexander Hamilton, Washington, and Grant; Walter Isaacson on Kissinger, Benjamin Franklin, Steve Jobs, and Leonardo da Vinci; Robert Caro on The Years of Lyndon Johnson (5 volumes); and The Oxford History of the United States (8 volumes published to date).

If this sounds a lot like work (a misconception, really, since these are superb historians whose writing sparkles with expository clarity, vivid characterizations, dramatic intensity, and balanced interpretation), I cannot deny an occasional dalliance in more mundane popular fiction and gorging myself on tasty treats gleaned from best-seller lists and word-of-mouth recommendations.


When I heard he was a favorite of John Kennedy, I chewed through all of Ian Fleming's James Bond tales before the film Dr. No made him a household word. Having enjoyed Michael Crichton since the publication of his first book, The Andromeda Strain, I predicted to my two media-savvy sons after reading Jurassic Park that it would make a blockbuster movie. Throughout the 1970's and 1980's, I managed to consume my fair share of the output of best-seller stalwarts like Arthur Hailey, Frederick Forsyth, Ken Follett, Tom Clancy, James Michener, Leon Uris, Herman Wouk, John LeCarre, Lawrence Sanders, and John Irving.

With all those skeletons in my closet, I feel eminently qualified to expound upon the idiosyncrasies of a compulsive reader.

A compulsive reader always finishes a book he starts, no matter how absurd, dull, obscure, or irrelevant it may be.

A compulsive reader always has a book on stand by; when he finishes the one in hand, he immediately snatches it up, if only to read one page, since he must always be in a book -- never in between. He has six or seven others stacked in his bedroom, future selections, some of which have lain dormant for months, even years, as more delectable titles have intervened.

A compulsive reader keeps a mental list of at least twenty books he intends to read in the near future.

A compulsive reader treasures every spare moment as an opportunity to deposit more pages in his completion bank. He produces his book in the blink of an eye -- at physician offices, in Jiffy Lube and car wash waiting rooms, in airport and train station lobbies, on the elliptical machine at the YMCA, and on any occasion while waiting for his spouse to emerge from her dressing room.

Like a cow grazing virgin pasture, a compulsive reader spends hours browsing bookstores, always in search of that elusive, provocative, coveted title -- rarely buying -- to add to his ready-to-read supply. At dinner parties, his eyes and attention have been known to wander in the direction of his host's bookshelf to evaluate his tastes and see if he possesses anything worth borrowing.

The compulsive reader finally runs out of bookshelf space, and, perish the thought, finds himself compelled to resort to the library or to de-accessing his collection -- through trades, discards, or donations.

A compulsive reader not only reads books; he reads about books -- in newspapers, in magazines, and now, for hours, like a hog wallowing in the mud, in a stupendous waste of time, on line. In fact, these days, any pretender, with a little research, can converse intelligently about any number of books whose covers he has never cracked.

And finally, the compulsive reader suffers from the rare phobia: fear of the unread book, which he compensates for by an hysterical desire to read every book in sight and often fulfills -- like I did upon moving into my parents' home nineteen years ago. Finding their expansive shelf space stocked with not only their own collection but also with the remnants of twenty-four (three times eight) years of high school and college, I vowed to leave no volume unthumbed.


It took me about a year to read those fifty or sixty which were new to me -- my average annual output. In the past 40 years, since graduating college, I estimate I have read 2500 books -- a dubious accomplishment I don't encourage others to emulate.

Like any other habit carried to excess, compulsive reading can have negative repercussions. It's an inactive, solitary pastime which can isolate the bookworm from his partner and from other family members and in certain social settings from friends and acquaintances -- for no greater good.

For reading is merely a relaxing, pleasurable avocation -- and has no more intrinsic value than surfing the television or internet airwaves, listening to music, playing golf or tennis, or attending sporting events. If one's purpose is to acquire knowledge or to be a better informed person, he can probably learn more in a shorter period of time by watching any number of history, discovery, or news channels. Having read so many books, I can hardly remember even the most recent titles, much less their plots or contents.

Such obtuseness would tend to debunk the claim of scientific researchers that reading does indeed have a correlative benefit; by exercising the brain, it may delay the onset of dementia. In my case, however, I am fearful of the opposite effect -- acceleration into senility -- when I consider the depths to which my reading regimen has deteriorated. Other than the spasmodic intrusion of a work of history, biography, or purported literary merit (I've become an aficionado of Anthony Trollope -- fifteen books in five years), it consists of one mind-numbing thriller after another.


That's not to say there's no method to this madness. Why would a well-educated, reasonably intelligent, naturally inquisitive, frustrated scholar stoop to such triviality?

Well, for one thing, the suspense keeps my attention. Even after digesting five hundred murder mysteries, I still can never predict the outcome or identify the guilty party.

Secondly, if there is any morally instructive message to be gleaned from this genre, it is that the competent fictional treatment of criminal activity can illuminate the fine line between illusion and reality and reveal universal truths about human behavior. Are not some of the motives that drive people to success (and failure) in their personal and professional lives -- greed, sexual passion, unrestrained ambition, pride -- the same ones that drive others to dissemble, deceive, steal, and, in extreme cases, murder? Are not the qualities exhibited by the detective in his relentless quest to unmask the culprit -- persistence, judgment, analysis, courage, patience -- prerequisites for mastering all of life's challenges?

Accordingly, the crime writing I read must meet certain self-selected criteria.

While the plots may border on the improbable, hinge on dubious coincidences, culminate in the incrimination of a minor, unsuspected character, obscure relevant information, and countenance too many gratuitous killings, they must retain a semblance of credibility and evince some intellectual complexity -- which is why I reject international, political, conspiratorial inventions.

Characters -- primary and secondary -- must reflect genuine psychological insight, thinking and acting in ways consistent with their relationships and predicaments. Virtuous protagonists should be flawed and conflicted, and the motives of villains cleverly suppressed, so that the lines between good and evil are often blurred. Recurring characters should both evolve and retain a comfortable familiarity, so that coming back to them after an interlude is like reconnecting with old friends.

The best crime writers are no less polished and professional than those in other genres in their ability to depict individuals and settings visually; to employ imagery judiciously and creatively; to convey realistic dialogue; and to capture the essence of a character or situation, whether by means of an effusive, digressive, or economical style.

Here are thirty authors who seem to meet those criteria:

(I've read every crime novel by the first twenty and am well on the way to completing the body of work of the remaining ten.)


Elizabeth George, an American who writes multifaceted, psychologically intense British murder mysteries starring the chilly, analytical Scotland Yard detective, Inspector Thomas Lynley, of noble birth, and his softer, more sensitive, working-class assistant, Sergeant Barbara Havers (They are exceptional in Playing for the Ashes and Deception on His Mind);


Dick Francis (recently in partnership with his son, Felix, taking his franchise down a notch), whose forty-plus tales of British horse-racing (with double entendre titles like Reflex, For Kicks, and Longshot) repeatedly plunge attractive, innocent, interchangeable thirty-something males into desperate situations from which, drawing on latent reserves of ingenuity and courage, they fortuitously manage to extricate themselves;


Steve Martini, whose alter ego attorney, Paul Madriani, is as cool and efficient as his creator in unraveling the twisted cords of evidence binding the wrongly accused, although his latest adventure, Guardian of Lies, is a little more fanciful, propelling him from his staid Southern California courtroom south of the border into the clutches of international terrorists seeking to resurrect a decades-old nuclear weapon;


Richard North Patterson, who has ambitiously tested the limits of the genre, using it in a diverse array of intellectually stimulating -- and occasionally overtly didactic -- novels to explore serious timely issues -- like presidential politics, abortion (Protect and Defend), gun control (Balance of Power), capital punishment (Conviction), the Israeli-Palestinian controversy (Exile), and the tragedies of African kleptocracy and exploitation (Eclipse);


Daniel Silva, whose art-restorer-turned-Israeli-agent, Gabriel Allon, introduced in The Kill Artist, constantly -- and reluctantly -- lured out of retirement by his crusty master and mentor, Ari Shamron -- glides effortlessly across Europe, from palatial villas to dangerous back alleys to secluded safe houses -- saving popes, rescuing kidnapped diplomats, facilitating defections, extracting crucial information, eliminating enemies, and dodging countless assassination attempts with a calmness and determination that render him wholly credible;


Patricia Cornwell, whose best work, The Body Farm, is many years behind her, yet whom I can't give up on, in spite of plots that crawl at a snail's pace through filler pages of tortuous dialogue and gratuitous backstories and a self-obsessed cast of characters -- Scarpetta, Benton, Marino, and Lucy -- whose emotional antics have become tiresome;


John Sandford, pseudonym of the prize-winning journalist, John Camp, who has convinced me that the Minneapolis-St. Paul setting of his nineteen Prey novels (Start with the early ones: Rules of Prey and Eyes of Prey) is home to more serial killers than any other city in the world, all of whom, after 380 pages of grim reaping, diabolical scheming by deviant minds high and low, and convoluted cat and mouse games, are eventually brought to justice (but rarely to trial) by the tenacious, unflappable (and witty) Lucas Davenport and his investigative team;


Sue Grafton, whose plucky private eye, Kinsey Millhone -- besides tracking down a host of missing persons (and bodies), solving decades-old murders, rooting out extortionists, uncovering fraudulent insurance schemes, jogging regularly in order to assuage the guilt of an occasional cheeseburger, and surviving innumerable close calls -- has, over the course of her alphabet series, as in T for Trespass, matured from a rather dry transcriber of people and places into a keen observer of human nature;


Stephen Hunter, whose mystery thrillers chronicling the daring exploits of World War II marksman Earl Swagger and his Vietnam veteran master sniper son, Bob Lee ("the Nailer") -- particularly Time to Hunt, Black Light, and Pale Horse Coming -- conquering heroes who prevail over impossible odds, resonate with an exuberance that willfully leavens implausibility with satire and illustrate time and again that, "in certain circumstances, there's nothing more necessary than a good man with a gun and the guts to use it well" (unofficial Stephen Hunter website);


Michael Connelly, the best in the business, whose three early works, The Poet, Blood Work, and The Last Coyote are masterpieces of crime fiction, in the last of which series protagonist, renegade detective Harry Bosch uncovers some tragic family history and, in a recurring Connelly theme, recognizes the squalid underbelly of Los Angeles crime and politics as symbolic of a society mired in self-delusion and corruption;


Lee Child, whose ex-military policeman, Jack Reacher, 6'5" 250 lbs., stands as the quintessential Marlboro Man, restless and rootless, shirking cars, money, houses, and clothes (other than what's on his back), strong enough with his fists, dexterous enough with a blade, and accurate enough with a rifle to outfight, outwit, and outshoot the evildoers he encounters in his cross-country wanderings, saving lives and reputations -- and sacrificing many more in the process -- in these marvelous pieces of pure escapist fiction (I like Echo Burning and One Shot);


Robert Crais, whose witty, hip, greatest-detective-in-the-world (or at least Los Angeles), Elvis Cole -- with the laconic, imperturbable Joe Pike watching his back -- and demolitions expert Carol Starkey (star of two stand-alone Crais novels) a new love interest, after live-in girl friend Lucy Chenier (whom he met in Voodoo River) soured on Cole's violent lifestyle when her son was kidnapped (in The Last Detective) -- battles his own vulnerabilities and self-doubt while surviving one harrowing shootout after another;


T. Jefferson Parker, another talented Southern California crime reporter who, working the Pacific coast, has produced seventeen police procedurals featuring a changing cast of law enforcement officers who, as a rule, wind up deeply and personally embroiled in the cases they are investigating (Check out California Girl and Silent Joe);


Further north, in San Francisco, John Lescroart, whose intricately-plotted courtroom dramas (like Nothing But The Truth) invariably require the combined skills of bartender-turned-defense-attorney, Dismas Hardy, and his half-Jewish, half-black friend, Detective Lieutenant Abe Glitzky -- both of whom have family problems of their own to deal with -- to uncover hidden motives, overcome departmental and political interference, and vindicate the falsely accused;


Moving east, George Pelecanos, story editor for HBO's The Wire, who merges an intimate knowledge of the neighborhoods, stores, bars, music, and people of Washington, D.C., a sensitive and authentic voice, gritty prose, street-smart dialogue, and fast-paced narratives to paint a hard-boiled picture of urban life and explore the meaning of race, class, family, and work (Read his breakthrough generational tale, The Big Blowdown);


Deborah Crombie, a Texas native who has traveled to England and Scotland to research her locked-room mysteries featuring the dour Detective Superintendent, Duncan Kincaid, and his feisty female partner (now lover), Sergeant Gemma James, who must sift through numerous red herrings, plenty of suspects, and lots of secrets (as in Dreaming of the Bones) to catch their killers -- while keeping their own relationship in balance;


Ian Rankin, Britain's best-seller, whose moody, dogged, hard-drinking, chain-smoking John Rebus stalks the grimy underworld of Edinburgh, Scotland, often bucking his superiors, always juggling two or three cases at a time, in novels (like The Falls) that are "fast, gripping, often paralleling real events, and rich in character and social observation" (Gordon Brown, Times Online, April 17, 2008);


Peter Robinson, another Brit, whose plodding, introspective Detective Superintendent Alan Banks confronts cases of ever greater complexity (like the stunner Innocent Graves) -- plagued by an increasingly tenuous relationship with his wife -- in a picturesque rural village that belies the gore, deviance, and violence lurking beneath the surface, in finely-wrought pieces of character as well as crime;


Jo Nesbo, vocalist and songwriter, former stockbroker, reporter, and club footballer, creator of Oslo police detective Harry Hole, whose tortuous battles with his own alcoholism and insecurities mirror his relentless pursuit through Norway's frigid landscape of egregiously depraved and gratuitously violent serial killers, including The Snowman, who targets adulterous mothers, sets frozen replicas of himself outside their windows as warnings, and slays them in the most gruesome manner;


Greg Iles, architect of Southern Gothic, who recovered from a horrendous automobile accident in 2011 that resulted in a ruptured aorta and partial leg amputation to craft his magnus opus, the 2000-page Natchez Burning trilogy, in which idealistic attorney Penn Cage grapples with his physician father's apparent murder of his long-time black nurse and uncovers a bloody trail of illicit relationships, law enforcement corruption, racial killings, and age-old vendettas, all told in precise and powerful language;


Wilbur Smith, who, well into his eighties (and with the assistance of co-authors) continues to churn out action-packed episodes in his ongoing saga of the Courtneys, from their early seafaring days as privateers and treasure hunters to their entrenchment in the economic, political, and military infrastructure of their South African homeland, each one replete with exquisite renderings of the native flora and fauna, melodramatic love affairs, and constant struggles both physical and psychological over land, wealth, and power;


Henning Mankell, internationally renowned, with over forty million in sales to his credit, most of them about his "melancholy, drunken, bullish" detective, Kurt Wallander (a name he plucked from the phone book), whose personal gloom and decay (he suffers from diabetes and, in his final case, the early stages of Alzheimer's) echo his creator's disillusionment with Swedish society, where the only redemption is found in the "common decency of ordinary people" and the ultimate foiling of "reassuringly wicked" criminals (Andrew Brown, The Guardian, October 5, 2015);


C. J. Box, whose genius consists of thrusting an idealistic, impetuous, and persevering Wyoming game warden named Joe Pickett into bizarre situations in which poaching, land-grabbing, trail guiding, off-season hunting, environmental exploitation, and the stalking of endangered species invariably culminate in one or more murders and often threaten the lives of his steadfast wife, three rambunctious daughters, and avenging guardian angel, all set amidst the gorgeous but at times inhospitable Bighorn Mountains;


Laura Lippman, like her original lead, the spunky Jewish-Catholic accidental private investigator, Tess Monaghan, a former reporter who, while moving beyond the standard "who done it" formula into a series of standalone works that are more character-driven and literary, has remained faithful to her gritty Baltimore roots, often drawing from real-life tragedies, as in the generational drama After I'm Gone, in which a convicted patriarch's disappearance connects to a delayed murder and the incrimination of several family members;


Archer Mayor, who employs his experiences as volunteer medical technician, local sheriff's deputy, and assistant state death examiner to concoct intriguing cases, usually two or three simultaneously, that send his unflappable detective Joe Gunther and his prize team at the Vermont Bureau of Investigation -- Willy, Sammie, and Lester -- into the lush, spare landscape of the New England countryside, the back alleys and dark corners of small towns under siege, and the hearts and minds of their quirky inhabitants, like the Tag Man, an eccentric cat burglar placed in a moral quandary when he stumbles upon a horrific scene during one of his nighttime forays;


John Connolly, Irish bartender turned American lyricist, as obsessed with the nature of evil as his protagonist, the indomitable Charlie Parker, is forever haunted by the shadows of his wife and daughter, whose killer he brought to justice in the introductory volume, Every Dead Thing, which planted the seeds of an evolving mythology that incorporates supernatural occurrences, heterodox religious sects, immortal saints and demons in human form, and secret pseudo mafias functioning as rogue police forces;


Donna Leon, whose love for her adopted Venice, ironic perspective on all matters Italian, and keen insight into the ambiguous nature of good and evil filter into every scene of Commissario Guido Brunetti's serial quest to do right amidst a society rife with corruption and hypocrisy, as exemplified in the stellar Drawing Conclusions, in which an investigation into the death of an elderly widow by apparent heart attack -- highlighted as always by verbal sparring with his professorial wife Paola while he enjoys her sumptuous cooking -- ultimately illuminates his "simple humanity, subtlety of mind, and refusal to succumb to the tyranny of bureaucrats and moralists" (Bill Ott, Booklist);


Philip Kerr, who thirty years ago sculpted a German model of Raymond Chandler's wise-cracking private eye, named him Bernie Gunther, and with the release of his Berlin Noir trilogy immersed him in the brutality of the Nazi regime and later in the bleakness of a postwar dystopia, ultimately expanding the series to fourteen, but only after an interlude during which he explored such diverse subjects as a modernistic skyscraper haunted by its own robots, a decimated society of the future dependent on stored blood transfusions for its survival, and the anti-Communist hysteria of the mid-sixties in which an assassin for hire and a disillusioned CIA agent stalk the newly-elected president, John F. Kennedy, in preparation for The Shot;


Harlan Coben, who after a couple of false starts gained traction with the invention of former basketball star turned sports agent turned sympathetic helpmate, Myron Bolitar, whose search for truth and justice -- aided by his wise-cracking, debonair, fabulously wealthy, partially psychotic, and ruthlessly protective sidekick, Windsor Horne Lockwood III -- inevitably leads to dangerous confrontations with mobsters, con men, thieves, murderers, and kidnappers, themes echoed in the author's subsequent independent works, in which typical New Jersey suburban families find themselves victimized by dark secrets from the past, mysterious disappearances, and vengeful neighbors, as in the convoluted but perfectly resolved Stay Close;



And finally, the godfather of them all, John D. MacDonald, prolific producer of more than 400 short stories and 65 novels between 1946 and 1986, most of the latter as original paperbacks, all of them animated by energetic, biting prose, plots that seduce and satisfy, characters that talk and think like real people, a "breathtaking knowledge of the contemporary world," and harsh commentary on the harm greedy developers and businessmen continually inflict upon his beloved Florida, best known for the brutally cynical, incurably romantic salvage specialist he dredged up at the behest of his publisher in 1962, Travis McGee, who lives in a fifty-two-foot houseboat, the Busted Flush, which he won in a poker game, and who earns his retirement money by exposing dirty deeds, recovering stolen property, and rescuing endangered damsels and dandies, each adventure colorfully recorded in aptly titled pieces like The Deep Blue Good-by and The Dreadful Lemon Sky (Jonathan Yardley, The  Washington Post, November 11, 2003).


While I make no claim that any of these writers will stand the test of time -- or even be remembered beyond the current generation -- in defense of my addiction, I summon no less an authority than George Orwell, who writes: "It is not only the great works that hold a place in readers' hearts; readable but less-accomplished works often have a longevity that their counterparts do not."

In an essay of the same name, Orwell defines "Good Bad Books" as "the kind . . . that have no literary pretensions but which remain readable when more serious productions have perished." He identifies two classic examples of the genre: Sherlock Holmes and Uncle Tom's Cabin, which, he observes, is full of "preposterous and melodramatic events" but is also "deeply moving and essentially true."

According to Orwell, escapist literature -- like contemporary crime fiction -- "forms pleasant patches in one's memory, quiet corners where the mind can browse at odd moments, but hardly pretends to have anything to do with real life." He notes that not all art need be intellectual in nature. "The existence of good bad literature -- the fact that one can be aroused or excited or even moved by a book which his intellect simply refuses to take seriously -- is a reminder that art is not the same thing as celebration."

And so, tonight, I celebrate, as I take up my newest thriller: The Turnaround, by George Pelecanos.